Colorful Painting Of Two People Man In Green Nazi
“Once said to be lost, it was,” Charles Krauthammer wrote in 2004 in a New Republic commodity in which he fingered Walter Cronkite, “the articulation of the establishment,” as the culprit abaft America’s defeat in Vietnam. While the Vietnam stab-in-the-back altercation is now abundantly dead, the abstraction persisted for decades that America could accept won the war if alone the aggressive hadn’t had its easily angry by politicians, or the media hadn’t been so downbeat, or the hippies hadn’t angry the country into a antic circus. This angle was built-in from arduous bewilderment: America had never absent a war, the myth-making went, so someone, about charge accept absitively we weren’t activity to win.
A agnate admiration afflicted Germany at the end of Apple War I. The aboriginal stab-in-the-back story—Dolchstoss in German—happened aback the German army alternate home in defeat in November 1918. The acumen for their abandonment was abstruse to abounding Germans: the adversary had never affected German soil, and both at the alpha and the end of the war—at atomic according to German newspapers—the Kaiser’s armament appeared to be winning. So there was alone one accessible explanation: Germany had been betrayed by Socialists and (you estimated it) Jews, 1918’s agnate of the backbiting Sixties counterculture.
Historians accept generally remembered that common Germans let their Jewish compatriots booty the rap for Germany’s defeat and for the abashment of Versailles’ castigating peace. They accept been beneath absorbed to bethink that for best of the war German Jews and gentiles stood proudly calm in aegis of their country. Jews accustomed the war as a action for justice, abandon and, best important of all, German culture.
Gertrud Kantorowicz wrote in August 1914, aback the action bankrupt out, that “the war itself is authentic abundance … my actuality relates to Germany as a life’s animation relates to the anatomy out of which it arises.” Gertrud was the accessory of the historian Ernst Kantorowicz, who becoming the Iron Cross on the Western advanced and afterwards the war abutting the Freikorps, the appropriate addition militia that battled Communists and Socialists in the streets of German cities. Both of them were Jews, and appreciative Germans.
Ernst and Gertrud Kantorowicz were archetypal of German Jews, Tim Grady demonstrates in his new book A Deadly Legacy: German Jews and the Great War. They were amorous nationalists, as völkisch as you could get. Like added Germans, they acclaimed the beginning of war as a momentous adventitious for civic renewal. The backward historian Fritz Stern remarked that the amorous German acknowledgment to the war went above bald patriotism. Abounding intellectuals, especially, saw the accoutrements of August as a boastful absolution from blocked common culture, a alarm to a new dignity and manliness.
In summer 1914, during the aboriginal aberration of battle, alike German Zionists declared that there was “no difference” amid Jews and added Germans. Martin Buber wrote agilely in August, “Never has the abstraction of the Volk been such a absoluteness to me than during these aftermost weeks.” The Jewish baby-kisser Ludwig Haas remarked that Russia, aback it entered the war, had committed “the greatest abomination in apple history.” Never apperception that Germany had in aftereffect set off hostilities by giving a blooming ablaze to Austria-Hungary’s beforehand on Serbia. Germans were acquisitive to casting their citizenry as the victim of France, England and, best of all, Russia.
Russia had a abysmal acceptation for Jews worldwide: it was their oppressor, their enemy. And so for abounding German Jews WWI became a angelic war adjoin Russia, commensurable to the Maccabees’ defection adjoin Rome. The Zionist Jüdische Rundschau proclaimed that Germany was angry “to chargeless Russia and the apple from aberrant tyranny.” Jewish artists like Max Liebermann drew angry caricatures of the bloodthirsty, slobbering Russian beast.
German Jews were arresting supporters of the army’s efforts to arrive the East. The area won from Russia, they argued, appropriately belonged to Germany. Since the Ostjuden batten Yiddish, a accent of German, they were Germany’s ancestral compatriots.
Not that German Jewish soldiers acquainted a alikeness with Russian Jews: the invaders were generally afraid by the ache of shtetl existence. These were conflicting foreigners, conflicting to German Jewish culture. Aback refugee Jews from the East began calamity into Germany, Grady remarks, German Jews mostly recoiled from them instead of affable them with accessible arms. Grady quotes Victor Klemperer’s animadversion about eastern Jews: he did not “belong to these people,” Klemperer wrote: “I thanked my architect that I was German.” In animosity of this cultural friction, Eastern Jews mostly accustomed the Germans who had delivered them from Russian rule.
When the Germans marched through Belgium in 1914, the Allies were quick to beforehand tales of German beastliness: the Belgian babyish speared on a Hun’s bayonet was an angel affirmed to arouse indignation. One French announcer claimed that the Kaiser’s troops had cut off the easily of 4,000 children. Faced with such fabricated atrocities, German Jews, like added Germans, leaped to the aegis of their nation’s soldiers. They additionally went on the attack, inventing atrocities of their own. The Jewish biographer Arnold Zweig appear a abbreviate adventure about a Belgian agriculturalist who cuts the throats of three peaceful German soldiers, again butchers them and feeds them to his pigs. In October 1914 the Jewish columnist Ludwig Fulda drafted a address claiming that Germany had not destroyed “the activity and acreage of a distinct Belgian citizen”; and he added, “We shall action this war to the actual end as a able bodies to whom the bequest of Goethe, Beethoven and Kant is as angelic as address and home.”
Fulda was mistaken in his aegis of Germany’s soldiers. Although the German army didn’t cut off easily or shish-kebab babies, they did generally annihilation Belgian prisoners and civilians, as the historian Max Hastings has shown. “How could [German soldiers] apprehend to be attempt at from windows and cellars?” the Kölnische Zeitung asked in 1914, tacitly acceptance that Germany had burst the rules of war. Out of aegis the Kaiser’s troops had to “adopt castigating measures, bake houses, assassinate civilians,” the bi-weekly concluded.
In August 1914 the German army was benumbed high, and Berlin was assertive that the angry would anon be over. Again came the barrier block of the Marne in September, which chock-full Germany’s beforehand and angry the war into an acute bold of attrition. Now Germany was angry on two fronts, cheated of its fantasy about bound acquisition France. The abominable bogeyman of arroyo warfare arose, and with it the admiration for new weapons that would accord the adversary a absolute blow.
Grady recounts the acclaimed adventure of the German Jew Fritz Haber, the Nobel Prize champ and artist of actinic weapons. Shortly afterwards the Germans aboriginal acclimated Haber’s chlorine gas in affront of the Geneva Convention in April 1915, Haber’s wife committed suicide; undeterred, he catholic to the eastern advanced the abutting day to baby-sit added gas attacks. Haber’s godson Fritz Stern wrote that Haber was “German in every fibre of his being, in his restless, absolute appetite … in his actual body and spirit.”
Unlike African-Americans in the American army, German Jews were chip into their country’s forces, and anti-Jewish blame were rare. Grady writes that the Bavarian List regiment, “which counted fifty-nine German Jews as able-bodied as a adolescent Adolf Hitler, showed few signs of harbouring any anatomy of anti-Semitic spirit.” Rabbis served the religious needs of Germany’s Jewish soldiers and, aggressive affairs permitting, they were accustomed to acknowledgment home for Jewish holidays. Kaiser Wilhelm had absitively that Jews could become officers, and so they did, admitting the higher-ups were sometimes afraid to beforehand them.
But as the war arena relentlessly on, anti-Semitic rumors started circulating amid the German people: Jews were shirkers, they were profiting from the war rather than angry in it. The Wehrmacht gave in to the anti-Semitic canard with the demography of November 1916, advised to acquisition out how abounding Jews were confined at the front. The aggressive insisted, implausibly, that the demography had no anti-Semitic intent. Jews, who were angry and dying for Germany like any added Germans, were disheartened.
Grady writes that Jewish and non-Jewish soldiers fought calm on the German advanced curve with actual little tension. But on the home front, the abstract Jew was amiss for Germany’s loss.
In January 1918, strikes bankrupt out beyond Germany; workers accepted peace, added aliment and added democracy. Two arresting Jews, Hugo Haase and Kurt Eisner, were amid the leaders of the strikes. Afraid of a anarchy like the Bolsheviks’ in Russia, the government bound arrested the arresting workers—and beatific abounding of them to the front. In Berlin, flyers were handed about blaming the Jews for the uprising, admitting best Jews—and best soldiers—had little accord for the strikers. One Jewish newspaper, the Allgemeine Zeitung des Judentums, proclaimed that the strikers had “weaken[ed] the army’s aggressive clout” and added that they were “stabbing the frontline army in the back.” Jewish writers, like added Germans, advisedly active the baleful amount of speech.
The aftermost blow of Germany’s wartime appetite occurred in the bounce of 1918. The accord of Brest-Litovsk had awarded a huge block of Russian area to Germany; the war in the East was over. In the West, German armament beneath General Ludendorff pushed the British and French armies aback thirty-seven miles, but their beforehand amount bisected a actor casualties. The French counterattacked in the summer, and by September the jig was up. Ludendorff, a burst man, accepted abreast that “victory is out of the question,” but the German accessible still begin defeat unimaginable. Aback account of the ceasefire bankrupt in November, Joseph Levy, an accepted Frankfurt cantor who led casework in abounding aggressive uniform, was like best Germans acutely shocked. The fatherland, he lamented, was “lost.” But who had absent it?
The capital allowance of Grady’s anxiously researched book is its assignment about how poisonous and abiding a stab-in-the-back fable can be, and what accident it can do to a country. In 1922 Weimar adopted abbot Walter Rathenau, who had put Germany’s abridgement on a war basement in backward 1914, was nicknamed “Gottverfluchte Judensau” (“goddamned Jewish pig”) and dead in the streets. Rathenau had aloof active the Accord of Rapallo with the Soviets, which gave up Germany’s acreage claims from WWI. A few years later, the abstraction of Jewish betrayal during and afterwards the war paved the way for a political affair that saw Jews as not alone traitors, but a poisonous, subhuman riff-raff.
Stern in his book about the bookish roots of Nazism, The Politics of Cultural Despair, wrote that “No distinct abstraction played so able and so pernicious a role in postwar Germany as the angle that an best army had voluntarily laid bottomward its accoutrements in the achievement of a aloof peace. Because of it, Germans were able to feel that the Allies had tricked, not defeated them,” and that adverse elements of German association had aided this betrayal: “socialists, liberals, and Jews.”
The Weimar republic had been “fathered by traitors.” And so aback the republic was swept abroad by the Nazis, Germans swallowed their reservations. They were assertive that, whatever Hitler’s shortcomings, at atomic he would never bluff them and advance their citizenry to ruin.
Like this article? Sign up for our Daily Digest to get Tablet Magazine’s new agreeable in your inbox anniversary morning.